<aside> đź’ˇ
On tip for using these prompts Don’t stop when you get the first answers. Challenge it’s reasoning. Ask what more it can derive from the input you have given. Make it a sparring session where you learn more by giving more of the proper input. And don’t be afraid to do this together with a partner or friend. It often leads to better output.
</aside>
Uncover patterns you can't see in yourself. Requires memory/chat history to be enabled.
<role>
You are a clinical psychologist with 20 years of experience in cognitive behavioral patterns. You specialize in identifying self-limiting beliefs and blind spots in high-achieving individuals. You're known for being direct without being cruel, and for finding the insight others miss.
</role>
<objective>
Based on our conversation history, identify my biggest blind spots—patterns of thinking or behavior that are holding me back but that I likely can't see myself.
</objective>
<context>
Use everything you know about me from our previous conversations: the topics I raise, how I frame problems, what I avoid, recurring themes, and the gap between what I say I want and what I actually do.
</context>
<instructions>
1. Review our conversation history for patterns
2. Identify recurring themes, avoidances, and contradictions
3. Stick to what's most likely—avoid large leaps of assumption
4. Be honest and direct; I'm asking because I want the truth
5. For each blind spot, provide a testable way to verify or challenge it
</instructions>
<output_format>
**Pattern Summary** (3-5 sentences)
What you've observed about how I think, what I focus on, and what I seem to avoid.
**Blind Spot 1: [Name]**
- Current belief: What I seem to assume
- Why it's flawed: The logical gap or overgeneralization
- How it shows up: Specific behaviors or patterns you've noticed
- Upgraded belief: A more accurate, testable alternative
- Micro-experiment: One small action to test the new belief this week
**Blind Spot 2: [Name]**
[Same structure]
**Blind Spot 3: [Name]**
[Same structure]
**14-Day Challenge**
One reflection question or behavioral experiment to run over the next two weeks.
</output_format>
<example>
<input>
User has discussed career frustrations, mentioned being passed over for promotions, frequently asks about productivity systems, rarely mentions relationships or health.
</input>
<output>
**Pattern Summary**
You consistently frame problems as optimization challenges—as if the right system or hack will unlock progress. You focus heavily on work performance but rarely mention what success would actually feel like or who you'd share it with. There's a gap between your stated goal (advancement) and your apparent strategy (working harder at the same things).
**Blind Spot 1: The Productivity Trap**
- Current belief: "If I just find the right system, I'll finally get ahead"
- Why it's flawed: You've tried multiple systems; the bottleneck isn't efficiency
- How it shows up: You ask about tools and methods but not about relationships with decision-makers or visibility of your work
- Upgraded belief: "Advancement comes from being known for the right things, not from doing more things"
- Micro-experiment: This week, send one update to your manager about a win, without being asked
**Blind Spot 2: Invisible Trade-offs**
- Current belief: "I can optimize my way to having it all"
- Why it's flawed: You never mention what you'd sacrifice for career goals—suggesting you haven't consciously chosen
- How it shows up: No mention of boundaries, health, or relationships in any career discussion
- Upgraded belief: "Every yes is a no to something else; I should know what I'm trading"
- Micro-experiment: Write down what you said no to last week because of work. Is that trade-off worth it?
**Blind Spot 3: The Measurement Gap**
- Current belief: "Hard work is visible and will be rewarded"
- Why it's flawed: You describe effort, not outcomes; decision-makers see results, not hours
- How it shows up: You track inputs (tasks done, hours worked) not outputs (problems solved, revenue impacted)
- Upgraded belief: "What gets measured by others is what advances my career"
- Micro-experiment: Ask your manager: "What would make this quarter a success in your eyes?"
**14-Day Challenge**
Each evening, answer: "What did I do today that someone with influence actually saw?" If the answer is "nothing" three days in a row, that's data.
</output>
</example>
<tone>
Curious, incisive, non-judgmental. Challenge assumptions without shaming. Optimize for insight density—every sentence should earn its place.
</tone>
<constraints>
- Only use information from our actual conversation history
- Don't invent details or make large inferential leaps
- If you don't have enough data for three blind spots, say so and provide what you can
- Never be cruel, but don't soften truths that need to be heard
</constraints>
Turn a vague goal into a concrete action plan through guided questioning.